Wednesday, November 29, 2017

Where All the Women Are Strong: Bone Strength Comparison

     A new study comparing the bones of central European women who lived during the first 6,000 years of farming with those of modern athletes has shown that the average prehistoric agricultural woman had stronger upper arms than living female rowing champions.




     Researchers from the University of Cambridge's Department of Archeology say this physical prowess was likely obtained through tilling soil and harvesting crops by hand, as well as the grinding of grain for as much as five hours a day to make flour.





      Until now, archeological investigations of past behavior have interpreted women's bones solely through direct comparison to those of men. However, male bones respond to strain in a more visibly dramatic way than female bones.



     The Cambridge scientists say this has resulted in the systematic underestimation of the nature and scale of the physical demands borne by women in prehistory.




     "This is the first study to actually compare prehistoric female bones to those of living women," said Dr. Alison Macintosh, lead author of the study published this month in the journal Science Advances.




     "By interpreting women's bones in a female-specific context we can start to see how intensive, variable and laborious their behaviors were, hinting at a hidden history of women's work over thousands of years."



     The study used a small CT scanner in Cambridge's laboratory to analyze the arm (humerus) and leg (tibia) bones of living women who engage in a range of physical activity: from runners, rowers and footballers to those with more sedentary lifestyles.




     The bone strengths of modern women were compared to those of women from early Neolithic agricultural eras through to farming communities of the Middle Ages.

     "We can forget that bone is a living tissue, one that responds to the rigours we put our bodies through. Physical impact and muscle activity both put strain on bone, called loading. The bone reacts by changing in shape, curvature, thickness, and density over time to accommodate repeated strain," said Dr. Macintosh.




      "By analyzing the bone characteristics of living people whose regular physical exertion is known, and comparing them to the characteristics of ancient bones, we can start to interpret the kinds of labor our ancestors were performing in prehistory."

      Over three weeks during trial season, Macintosh scanned the limb bones of the Open- and Lightweight squads of the Cambridge University Women's Boat Club, who ended up winning this year's Boat Race and breaking the course record. These women, most in their early twenties, were training twice a day and rowing an average of 120 kilometers a week at the time.




      The Neolithic women analyzed in the study (from 7400-7000 years ago) had similar leg bone strength to modern rowers, but their arm bones were 11-16% stronger for their size than the rowers, and almost 30% stronger than typical Cambridge students. {Bone scan is at left, above, vs. x-ray to the left}.




     The loading of the upper limbs was even more dominant in the study's Bronze Age women (from 4300-3500 years ago), who had 9-13% stronger arm bones than the rowers but 12% weaker leg bones.

     A possible explanation for this fierce arm strength is the grinding of grain. "We can't say specifically what behaviors were causing the bone loading we found. However, a major activity in early agriculture was converting grain into flour, and this was likely performed by women," said Dr. Macintosh.




      "For millennia, grain would have been ground by hand between two large stones called a saddle quern. In the few remaining societies that still use saddle querns, women grind grain for up to five hours a day." {The mano and metate is a variety of saddle quern used for nixtamalization or grinding.}

     "The repetitive arm action of grinding these stones together for hours may have loaded women's arm bones in a similar way to the laborious back-and-forth motion of rowing."




     However, Macintosh suspects that women's labor was hardly likely to have been limited to this one behavior.

     "Prior to the invention of the plough, subsistence farming involved manually planting, tilling and harvesting all crops," said Dr. Macintosh. "Women were also likely to have been fetching food and water for domestic livestock, processing milk and meat, and converting hides and wool into textiles.

     "The variation in bone loading found in prehistoric women suggests that a wide range of behaviours were occurring during early agriculture. In fact, we believe it may be the wide variety of women's work that in part makes it so difficult to identify signatures of any one specific behavior from their bones."




     Dr. Jay Stock, senior study author added: "Our findings suggest that for thousands of years, the rigorous manual labor of women was a crucial driver of early farming economies. The research demonstrates what we can learn about the human past through better understanding of human variation today."

Where all the women are strong,
Steph (former member of Smith College Crew)

Monday, November 6, 2017

Even Mammoth Males Took More Risk!

     You may know why/how I came up with this week's Partial Ellipsis of the Sun topic.





      "Male mammoths really had to watch their steps. More than two-thirds of woolly mammoth specimens recovered from several types of natural traps in Siberia came from males, researchers report November 2, 2017, in Current Biology."





      "Paleogenomicist Patrícia Pečnerová of the Swedish Museum of Natural History in Stockholm and her colleagues examined genomic data recovered from 98 mammoth bone, tooth, tusk and hair shaft specimens and found that 69 percent of their owners were male." 





      "Sex biases in fossil preservation are rare, and the sexes were almost certainly balanced at birth. So the researchers considered whether social and behavioral patterns might have meant that male mammoths more often died in such a way that their remains were buried and preserved, such as becoming trapped in a bog or falling through thin ice."





     "In modern elephants, herds of females and young live together, led by an experienced female, whereas males are more likely to live in bachelor groups or alone. That could result in more risk-taking behavior for those males." 




       "Woolly mammoths, the distant cousins of modern elephants, may have had the same social structures, the researchers suggest."




     "The study, the authors say, highlights how fossil genomic data can help illuminate the past social structures and behavior of extinct animals — and how existing fossils may not fully represent the original population. . ."





      And that risky behavior in males, be they mammoths or human beings, happens. . .






Woolly, Boolly, Woolly, Boolly,

Steph