Sunday, May 27, 2018

"Opposite Birds:" Why Being Grounded May Have Been the Counterintuitive Key to Survival


     The asteroid impact that caused a mass extinction 66 million years probably also triggered the collapse of forests worldwide, a new investigation of the plant fossil record concludes. 



     Needing trees and extensive plant cover for nesting or food could have been a fatal drawback for winged dinosaurs, including some ancient birds.


        Here is the caption for the diagram above: 

         "Ancestral Ecological Reconstructions Reveal Bias toward Non-arboreal Birds across the K-Pg:

      Bayesian ancestral ecological reconstructions (AERs) indicate that the most deeply diverging crown bird clades, including Neornithes (all crown birds), Neognathae (Galloanserae + Neoaves), and Neoaves, were ancestrally non-arboreal (pp > 0.99 for each node), with numerous independent transitions toward arboreality arising in the early Cenozoic, presumably after global forests had recovered from the Chicxulub impact. Concentric background rings demarcate geologic periods: the inner gray circle at the center indicates the Late Cretaceous, with the K-Pg boundary (66.02 Ma) indicated by the red dashed line; the white ring indicates the Paleogene (66.02–23.03 Ma), separated from the Neogene (23.03–2.58 Ma) by the dashed blue line. Tips extend to the present. Pie charts at the nodes indicate SIMMAP posterior probabilities for ancestral ecology, under our model. Branch colors represent a single randomly sampled stochastic character map from a posterior sample of 1,000 maps. The underlying phylogeny and taxonomy follow; qualitatively identical patterns are inferred using an alternative phylogenetic hypothesis."

       Reconstructing the ecology of ancient birds suggests that modern birds descended from species that survived because they could live on the ground, a research team proposes in the June 4, 2018, Current Biology.



      “You probably would have died anyway regardless of habitat,” says study coauthor Dr. Daniel Field, an evolutionary paleobiologist at the University of Bath in England. “But if you could get along on the ground, you at least had a shot at surviving across this devastated landscape.”

     The shock wave from the strike probably flattened trees within a radius of 1,500 kilometers, Dr. Field says. Wildfires ignited around the planet and then came the acid rain. Clouds of ash and dust may have darkened the sky for several years, and researchers suspect that photosynthesis waned. Yet some lucky birds, but no other dinosaurs, survived the hellscape.


     For clues to what made a survivor, researchers turned to fossilized pollen from before and after the fiery impact. Abundant kinds of flower-bearing and cone-bearing plants left pollen just before the asteroid hit and again starting about a thousand years afterward. In between those times of diversity, however, ferns dominated, the team notes. A kind of “disaster flora,” ferns (making spores instead of flowers and seeds) do well at recolonizing land. Seed plants, however, weren’t thriving.



     Analyzing evolutionary histories of modern birds supports the idea of tree dependence as a vulnerability for the earliest fowl, the researchers say. Specialists in bird evolution now generally agree on the lowest, oldest branches of the bird family tree, Field says. The bottommost one, for instance, includes such modern species as ground-dwelling ostriches and smaller, flight-capable birds called tinamous, which might be more like the ancient birds that dodged extinction.



     Working backward along these low branches, researchers used fossils and known bird traits to reconstruct the most likely lifestyles of the earliest survivors. These probably weren’t tree-dependent birds, the researchers conclude.



     The glory days of dinosaurs had had plenty of flying tree-dwellers. So far, paleontologists have identified at least 80 kinds of what are called “opposite birds,” the Enantiornithes. “If you saw one flying around today, you’d say, ‘Well, that’s a bird,’ ” Field explains. Their feet looked like those of birds that perch on tree limbs, so he’s not surprised that a fossil of an opposite bird from this probably arboreal group has never been found in rock formed after the dinosaur doomsday.



     What did happen, however, was that when trees and forests came back after the disaster, birds quickly evolved arboreal lifestyles, the team says.



     Many people don’t realize that birds almost died off during the mass extinction, too, says paleontologist Stephen Brusatte of the University of Edinburgh who has studied bird evolution but was not involved in the new study. What let the few survivors squeak through, he says, has been a mystery for a long time. The whole scenario of a ground-dweller’s advantage and then a return to the trees “makes a lot of intuitive sense.”

     Essentially, surviving on the ground, without much flying, for awhile may be what ultimately made the later arboreal environments so rich with modern-day birds.

No, er, YES, GROUSE about it!
Steph

Monday, May 21, 2018

An Extraterrestrial Empanada, A Space Ravioli, and A Planetary Baguette: Simulating Saturn’s Moons

       An extraterrestrial empanada. . . A space ravioli. . . A planetary baguette.  Some of Saturn’s moons have shapes that are strangely reminiscent of culinary creations.



      In the image below, simulated collisions between two moonlets can lead to oddly shaped moons (bottom row) that closely resemble some of Saturn’s moons (top row; from left to right: Pan, Atlas and Prometheus).



     Images of the oddly-shaped moons, mostly from now-defunct Cassini spacecraft, got planetary scientists wondering how these satellites ended up with such strange shapes. Now, researchers suggest that collisions between moonlets could account for these shapes according to a study published online today, May 21, 2018, in Nature Astronomy. {The original Nature article includes some of these space culinary terms.}




     Dr. Adrien Leleu , a planetary scientist at the University of Bern in Switzerland, and colleagues developed computer simulations that let the scientists virtually smack together similar-sized moonlets at various speeds and angles. The team found that, at low angles and relative speeds of tens of meters per second (roughly equal to a car traveling on country roads), impacts can create offbeat shapes that look like the misfits around Saturn.



      Head-on collisions result in a flattened moon like Pan, which resembles an extraterrestrial empanada. An impact angle of just a few degrees leads to an elongated satellite such as Prometheus, which looks like a French baguette.



      Not all run-ins create a weird-looking moon. At higher angles, for example, moonlets might "hit and run." Or they could form highly elongated rotating moons that subsequently break apart.


     Dr. Leleu and collaborators focused on the smaller moons of Saturn that orbit within the planet’s rings. But the team also found that a similar collision between two larger moonlets could also account for the odd shape of Iapetus, a more distant walnut-shaped moon with a pronounced ridge along its equator that has puzzled scientists since the belt’s discovery. Other speculative origins for the ridge include volcanoes, plate tectonics or ring debris that rained down on the moon.



     I will admit that I was drawn to the odd shapes of possible moonlets because they reminded me of images of fossils like fusulinids (see below). Nature likes reusing cool shapes, I suppose.



Enjoy this planetary patisserie!
Steph